How ironic, Sharpie — you falsely accuse me of committing and ad hominem, when I did no such thing, and then you commit an ad hominem.

I didn’t discredit the paper. Post-docs in the professors own lab did. And they did it through scientific experimentation which demonstrated the professor’s conclusions were false. And then the professor had the decency to admit that he made an error, jumping to an unsupported conclusion too rashly, driven by his “belief” in the fairy tale story of evolution.

If you wanted to discuss the paper, or the retraction, or my article, in an intelligent manner, you would need to first read the retraction, for which I provided a link, and inform yourself of the facts in the case. But I know that you don’t want to discuss it rationally or intelligently. I know that you just want to pretend that I’m a stupid “theist”and that science is beyond my intellectual capability, and you want to hang on to your irrational belief in a fairy tale and pretend it’s “science”. It’s no such thing.